Fracking for shale gas has been the game changer in
the global exploration of energy. Now, the discovery of shale gas in Lancashire
and at Barton Moss has brought the subject right to our doorstep.
Some people see fracking as the answer to the UK’s
energy needs, others claim it causes pollution, earthquakes and is a further
use of carbon.
What do you think?
Discuss, the home of the intellectually curious in
Manchester, will be hosting a debate at the Museum of Science & Industry on Tuesday 28th October. Joining the panel will be Happy Mondays band
member, and aspiring Politician, Bez alongside two professors from the
University of Manchester, on opposing sides of the debate as well as a leading Blackpool
business woman.
For the motion
Ernie Rutter, Professor of Structural Geology at the University of Manchester
Professor Rutter has said: ‘The
potential importance of the development of shale gas resources to the UK
economy and for a politically secure energy resource have been well rehearsed
for those who have listened. The facts of the American experience of falling
energy prices coupled with security of supply, job creation and economic
stimulation demonstrate this potential.
Claire Smith, president,
Stay Blackpool
Claire Smith has said: “Shale gas could be the catalyst to get things moving. Horner Blackpool
should be the engine driver for the Fylde Coast. We must not dither on this
one. It’s a chance to make a step change.”
Against the motion
Bez, Happy Mondays and anti-fracking protestor
Bez told the Guardian: “I went along to
the fracking protest at Barton Moss to lend my support because of the concerns I have about environmental
issues. If we allow fracking to happen in Salford and Manchester, any idea of a
permaculture society will end with it. I am standing as an MP to draw attention
to the debate because I believe fracking is unsafe technology and the damage it
could do to the environment is irreversible.”
Professor Kevin Anderson,
Deputy Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research at The
University of Manchester
Professor Anderson has
argued: “Shale gas is indisputably a high-carbon energy source.
It is identical to natural gas – consequently when combusted it emits large
quantities of carbon dioxide.
The science of global warming, the maths of our
emissions and our pledge to limit temperature increases to below a 2°C rise
lead to the conclusion that shale gas must remain in the ground if we are to
avoid ‘dangerous climate change’.”
To place your vote, sign up to the event here. Join the conversation with @mcrscifest and @discussMCR #msf14
No comments:
Post a Comment